What an explainable AI trade plan should contain
Read the evidence, invalidation, price source, position size and risk decisions behind a structured trade plan before using a paper workflow.
Begin with an identifiable instrument
A plan needs more than a company name. Check the exchange, segment and instrument identifier. For a contract, its expiry and other identifying fields matter as well. An analysis for one listing must not silently become an order or paper position in another. The identifier used by the quote, chart and proposed plan should agree.
Keep evidence close to the conclusion
A useful plan explains the observation behind its thesis. Trend, momentum, price structure and volatility can be contributing factors, but a list of labels alone is not an explanation. Look for the supporting inputs, the period being analysed and reasons to avoid the setup. A scanner may reasonably conclude that no plan should be generated.
Make invalidation visible
Entry, stop and target fields should be tied to the reasoning rather than selected only to produce an attractive ratio. The plan should state the condition under which the original idea no longer applies. If the evidence or source price changes, review the plan again rather than assuming a previous approval remains valid.
Treat a score as a description of the analysis
An AI or rule-based score does not automatically measure the chance of profit. Ask which factors contribute and what the scale means. The explanation should make uncertainty and missing inputs apparent. A confident sentence cannot supply a missing timestamp, verified account or risk decision.
Review the independent risk decision
Check the capital basis, proposed quantity, stop distance, applicable lot and tick constraints, available exposure and data freshness. A configured percentage is a planning rule; it does not guarantee a maximum realised loss. Keep fees and slippage assumptions explicit, including when the paper model does not include them.
Follow the plan into the journal
The supported KAVIX paper workflow records reviewable events rather than treating a scanner result as a completed action. Inspect confirmation, paper fill, remaining quantity and close history where available. Real execution is disabled. Preserve the original evidence so later reviews can distinguish the plan from observations made afterwards.
Sources and further reading
KAVIX workflow documentation ↗